Legal Opinion
Ana Painter v. Golden Rule Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 14, 1997No. 96-3114Published
1Opinion of the Court
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 96-3114 No. 96-3454 ___________ Ana Painter, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * Appeals from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Golden Rule Insurance Company, * * Defendant - Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: April 14, 1997 Filed: August 14, 1997 ___________ Before LOKEN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges. ___________ LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Ana Painter claimed health insurance benefits under a conversion policy issued by Golden Rule Insurance Company (“Golden Rule”). Golden…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.