Legal Opinion

Sheridan v. Sheridan

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1936No. Civ. No. 5524PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRUTON, J., pro tem.

On December 8, 1933, respondent filed his complaint in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, praying for a divorce from his wife, the appellant here. Appellant subsequently filed a cross-complaint, and upon the trial of the action, December 21, 1933, was *201granted an interlocutory decree of divorce. No opposition was offered by the respondent.

On April 13, 1934, appellant moved the court to set aside the decree on the ground that at the time of the trial her mental condition was such that she did not appreciate the nature or character of her own acts. Appellant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of WineteerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Kellett v. KellettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kalmus v. KalmusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. People v. PeakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. People v. PeakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API