Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ebert v. . Disher

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBarnhill, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff against the defendant in the Forsyth county court, to recover a certain piece of land, some 6.23 acres and a 30-foot road, on the south side of County Club Road, near the city of Winston-Salem, N.C. Henry F. Burke and wife, Eugenia Burke, the grandfather and grandmother of plaintiff, on 28 April, 1916, deeded her the above mentioned land as a gift and deeded the adjoining tract to plaintiff's sister, Mrs. C. C. Disher, as a gift. The defendant built a house on his wife's lot. Plaintiff's husband, T. E. Ebert, built a house on her lot and the two sisters…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Avery v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. O'Briant v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Luton v. Badham.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. McCall v. Textile Industrial InstituteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Kivett v. . McKeithanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jamerson v. . LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Pickelsimer Ex Rel. Gash v. PickelsimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Humphrey v. FaisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Wells v. ForemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Neal v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API