Legal Opinion

Baymond v. Sternberger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1934No. Appeal 409PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

This is an action in trespass by a guest in a car to recover damages for personal injuries suffered as a result of the alleged negligence of the driver and owner of the car. The plaintiff has a judgment and the defendant asks for a new trial on the ground that references were made at the trial to the fact that the defendant was protected by insurance and because the verdict was excessive. We are of the opinion that the motion for a new trial was properly refused.

When plaintiff was under cross-examination by appellant’s counsel, he was being interrogated as to a written…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lenahan v. Pittston Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Hollis v. United States Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Scott v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Ellsworth v. LauthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Helmick v. South Union TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Morris v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Jury v. New York Central RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Stompler v. RichmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Billard v. Honesdale BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API