Legal Opinion
Graceman v. Goldstein
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 7, 1992No. 34, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOTZ, Judge.
An arbitrator awarded appellants, Lloyd and Leila Grace-man, $72,268.69 in their dispute against appellees, Jerry Goldstein and seven other investors (the “Buyers”), who purchased the stock of a women’s apparel business from the Gracemans. The Circuit Court for Montgomery County vacated the award, principally because it found that the arbitrator of the dispute between the Gracemans and the Buyers exhibited “evident partiality” in favor of the Grace-mans and, secondarily, because a “significant and substantial question” existed as to whether the arbitrator exceeded his power in…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Forsythe International, S.A. v. Gibbs Oil Company of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- George Day Construction Co., Inc. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 354Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Barcon Associates, Inc. v. Tri-County Asphalt Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- American Postal Workers Union Afl-Cio v. United States Postal Service, San Francisco Bulk Mail Center, Richmond, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bopp v. BramesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Cellular Radio Corp. v. OKI America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Birkey Design Group, Inc. v. Egle Nursing Home, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- MCR of America, Inc. v. GreeneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Sharp v. DowneyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.