Hamilton v. Diefenderfer
Wyoming Supreme Court
Error to the District Court, Sheridan County; Hon. Carroll H. Parmelee, Judge. Plaintiff in error moved to strike the bill of exceptions and to dismiss, whereupon defendant in error moved for leave to withdraw the bill for the purpose of amendment. The hearing was upon both motions. The material facts are stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Error to the District Court, Sheridan County; Hon. Carroll H. Parmelee, Judge. Plaintiff in error moved to strike the bill of exceptions and to dismiss, whereupon defendant in error moved for leave to withdraw the bill for the purpose of amendment. The hearing was upon both motions. The material facts are stated in the opinion. The assignment of error based upon the overruling of the motion for new trial is sufficient to bring before the court all the assignments of error set forth in such motion. Some of them do not demand for their consideration an examination of all the evidence. The…
1Per curiam
The defendant in error filed a motion in this case to strike the bill of exceptions from the files on the ground that it fails to show that it contains all the evidence, and that the only point discussed in the brief of the plaintiff in error is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment. The plaintiff in error filed a motion supported by affidavit for leave to withdraw the bill for the purpose of returning the same to the district court and having the certificate thereto amended so as to clearly show that the bill contains a full, true and correct transcript of all the evi*141dence…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Callahan v. HouckWyoming Supreme Court · 1905
- Freeburgh v. LamoureuxWyoming Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- Laibly v. HalsethWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
- Posvar v. PearceWyoming Supreme Court · 1928