Legal Opinion
Wilson v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 20, 2009No. 91, September Term, 2007PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
In this criminal appeal, we consider whether petitioner was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We shall hold that the police officer’s seizure of petitioner was an unlawful arrest and in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Accordingly, the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence resulting from his unlawful seizure.
*421I.
Francis Eugene Wilson, petitioner, was indicted by the Grand Jury for Washington County on charges of second degree assault, resisting arrest, disarming a law…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- State of Tennessee v. Kenneth McCormickTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. RoshchinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- United States v. Tyrone HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.