Legal Opinion
Eric Grandberry v. Brian Smith
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 5, 2013No. 12-2081PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
Eric Grandberry petitioned for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. His petition did not seek relief from his criminal conviction, but from a disciplinary sanction that a state prison had imposed against him. The sanction was a loss of “good-time” credits that will extend by 30 days the time he spends in custody. He has alleged that the Indiana prison’s disciplinary proceedings failed to provide him with the minimal due process protections required under the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court exercised jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a) and denied…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Swarthout v. CookeSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Montez v. McKinnaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Joseph Coady v. Donald T. Vaughn the District Attorney of the County of Montgomery the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- James Brunson v. Scott MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Oscar Thomas v. Marc ClementsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. MacH Mining, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Alejandro Zuniga-GaleanaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Eric Grandberry v. Brian SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.