Legal Opinion

United States v. Kenneth Wines

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 15, 2012No. 10-30233PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

This appeal is from the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The § 2255 motion asserts a claim that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by advising the appellant, Kenneth Earl Wines, not to testify in his federal criminal trial. Because he fails to demonstrate that he was *600prejudiced, Wines has not established a constitutional violation and is not entitled to § 2255 relief. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.

I

A

We first recount the evidence presented at Wines’s criminal trial at which he was convicted by a jury. We will later deal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Wong v. BelmontesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Jonathan Wayne Nobles v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Donjel Lamont Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2013
  2. Corley v. Google, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  3. United States v. Michael ArringtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  4. Marcus Coleman v. Darrel Vannoy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  5. Arthur Franklin Miller, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API