United States v. Kenneth Wines
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:
This appeal is from the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The § 2255 motion asserts a claim that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by advising the appellant, Kenneth Earl Wines, not to testify in his federal criminal trial. Because he fails to demonstrate that he was *600prejudiced, Wines has not established a constitutional violation and is not entitled to § 2255 relief. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
A
We first recount the evidence presented at Wines’s criminal trial at which he was convicted by a jury. We will later deal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Wong v. BelmontesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Jonathan Wayne Nobles v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Donjel Lamont Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2013
- Corley v. Google, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- United States v. Michael ArringtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Marcus Coleman v. Darrel Vannoy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Arthur Franklin Miller, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.