Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Clark
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 17, 1949No. 9888PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
• In this proceeding, the National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order against the respondents, George H. and Mildred H. Clark, copartners trading as Clark Phonograph Record Co., requiring them to desist from activities found by the Board to be unfair labor practices. 78 N.L.R.B/34. The respondents’ defense consists of an attack on (1) the adequacy of the evidence to support the findings of the Board; (2) the authority of the Board to issue the order, and (3) the propriety, in a number of respects, of the order itself.
• On May 10,-1946, the respondents…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Falk Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- National Labor Relations Board v. National Garment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mylan-Sparta Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- National Labor Relations Board v. Caroline Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Petri Cleaners, Inc. v. Automotive Employees, Laundry Drivers & Helpers Local No. 88California Supreme Court · 1960
- National Labor Relations Board v. Flemingsburg Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- In Re JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Fulton Bag & Cotton MillsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Chesterfield Textile Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.