State v. Encee
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
Convicted of armed robbery, defendant appeals. She contends that the trial court erred in refusing to reduce the charge of “armed robbery” to “robbery.” In support of this contention she asserts that the object she held while committing the robbery was not positively identified as a deadly weapon.
Robbery is a third degree felony; robbery while armed with a deadly weapon is a second degree felony. Section 40A-16-2, N.M.S.A. 1953. A firearm, whether loaded or unloaded, is one of the meanings of “deadly weapon.” Section 40A-1-13(B), N.M.S.A. 1953.
There is evidence that prior…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. CrouchNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- State v. PolskyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- Watson v. NixDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1982
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. RushingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.