Legal Opinion

Reinbacher v.Conly

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided February 3, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marvel, Vice Chancellor:

The complaint filed herein is concerned with the use to which a small plot of land located in Brandy-wine Hundred may lawfully be put. The defendant, James S. Conly, now has administrative approval, given under a zoning plan and regulations promulgated by the Levy Court of New Castle County pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 26 of Title 9, Del.C. to use the plot in question for commercial-neighborhood shopping purposes. The plot fronts on Wilson and Marsh Roads at a point where these streets run together at an angle of approximately sixty degrees and is delineated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Offutt v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  2. Keller v. City of Council Bluffs, IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  3. American Oil Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Eckes v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  5. Eggebeen v. SonnenburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pruett v. DaytonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1961
  2. Scarborough v. MAYOR & COUN. OF TOWN OF CHESWOLDCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
  3. Reinbacher v. ConlyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1958
  4. Ullman v. SantowCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
  5. Bachman v. Daniel D. Rappa, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API