Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Havard
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 31, 1924No. 1 Div. 290PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
This is a suit by Eva J. Havard agáinst G. M. Rosengrant, doing business under the name of Riverside Manufacturing Company, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, to recover compensation thereunder for herself and two children, Fritz R. Havard, Jr., aged eight, and Ralph Havard, aged six, for the death of Fritz R. Havard, an employé of the defendant, husband of plaintiff, and fáther' of the two children.
The plaintiff secured an order of the court authorizing her under section 7 of the act to employ an attorney for the purpose of proceeding against the defendant under section 28 of the act…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Western Fuel Co. v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- J. H. Burton Sons Co. v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Baughn v. Little Cahaba Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Ex Parte RosengrantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Lawrence v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Span v. Accident & Guarantee Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.