Legal Opinion

King v. Wooster

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1922No. 23,492PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 1; James A. McClure, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*626The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Julia B. King brought this proceeding asking a writ of mandamus against Lorraine Elizabeth Wooster as state superintendent of public instruction, requiring her to approve the plaintiff’s account against the state for her services as secretary of the board of education from July 1, 1920, to September 9, 1920. The district court allowed the writ and gave judgment against the defendant for the plaintiff’s attorney’s fee. The defendant appeals.

The defendant seeks to justify her refusal upon the ground that the plaintiff was not entitled to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Cates v. KnappSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barten v. Turkey Creek Watershed Joint District No. 32Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Jansky v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. Kittredge v. BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Corder v. Kansas Board of Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. Day v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API