Legal Opinion

Price v. Hall

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 23, 1933No. 8 Div. 449PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Inadequacy of a remedy at law is the foundation stone upon which equity jurisprudence rests, and it is therefore a fundamental rule that before a complainant is entitled to relief in a court of equity, he must have no plain and adequate remedy at law. Bullard Shoals Mining Co. v. Spencer, 208 Ala. 663, 95 So. 1; National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Propst, 219 Ala. 437, 122 So. 656; Yellow Pine Export Co. v. Sutherland-Innis Co., 141 Ala. 667, 37 So. 922; Turner v. City of Mobile, 135 Ala. 73, 33 So. 132; Hunt v. Jones, 203 Ala. 541, 84 So. 718; Pair v. Cummings, 197 Ala.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Turner v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  2. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. PropstSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Fair v. CummingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Bullard Shoals Mining Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Hunt v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Floyd v. AndressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Butler v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Samples v. GrizzellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. White v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. City of Tuscaloosa v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API