City of Tuscaloosa v. Williams
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
This bill against the city sought to “remove the obstruction of the natural watercourse on the land of the complainants and to restore said watercourse to its original dimensions in width and depth” and to enjoin the respondent from obstructing the natural flow of water.
The demurrer of the city to the bill as amended being overruled, the appeal is prosecuted from that decree. „
The respective rights of riparian owners of land as to the natural flow of water and use thereof, the discharge of water falling upon or flowing through or from lands, and the rights of owners of upper…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Atchison v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Rio Grande Western Railway Co. v. StringhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Arizona Copper Co. v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Howell v. City of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Pate v. BrunerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- W & H MacHine & Tool Co. v. National Distillers & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- De Soto Falls Development Co. v. LibbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Town of Frisco City v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943