Legal Opinion

White v. Hale

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 17, 1937No. 6 Div. 69PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

The bill is by the guardian of a non compos mentis, and seeks the cancellation of a deed executed by his ward, prior to guardianship proceedings, to the defendant, her son.

The ground for cancellation is the alleged insanity of the grantor, the fraud and undue influence averred in general terms being referable solely to the matter of insanity, just as appears to have been the form of the bill considered in Wilkinson v. Wilkinson, 129 Ala. 279, 30 So. 578.

The ward is not a party; the guardian alone files the bill. The court would therefore be without authority to enter a decree…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kelen v. BrewerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Silverstein v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Upshaw v. EubankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Wilkinson v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  5. Altman v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scott v. LeigeberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Tyler v. CophamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Thornton v. First National Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. Lynd v. Marshall Cnty. Pediatrics, P.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API