Legal Opinion

(PC) Cortijo v. St. Andre

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 11, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00454Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEANGELO CORTIJO, No. 2:23-cv-0454 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ST. ANDRE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants denied him the ability to make phone calls, 19 retaliated against him, and discriminated against him in violation of his constitutional rights. 20 Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2), motion 21 to…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API