Legal Opinion

McManus v. Sturm Foods Inc.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided August 26, 2013No. Civil No. 11-565-GPMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MURPHY, District Judge:

On April 15, 2013 the Court heard argument on Plaintiffs’ pending motion for class certification. (Doc. 99). Plaintiffs claim that Defendant Sturm Foods, a dry grocery manufacturer and distributor, and Defendant Treehouse, as Sturm’s sole owner, violated the consumer protection statutes and unjust enrichment laws of the eight named states with regard to their Grove Square Coffee single serving coffee product (Doc. 53). Per the amended complaint, Defendants misrepresented and omitted the true nature of Grove Square Coffee products by indicating the…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Siegel v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API