Legal Opinion

Carolene Products Co. v. Banning

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1936No. 29759PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff to secure an injunction to restrain defendants from enforcing section 81-1022, Comp. St. 1929, known as the “filled milk” statute, for the reason that it is unconstitutional and void. From a decree awarding an injunction, defendants appeal.

Section 81-1022, Comp. St. 1929, provides as follows: “It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation, by himself, his servant or agent, or as the servant or agent of another, to manufacture, sell or exchange, or have in possession with intent to sell or exchange, any milk, cream, skim milk, buttermilk,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weaver v. Palmer Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Hebe Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. State ex rel. Carnation Milk Products Co. v. EmeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Gillespie v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Carolene Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Lincoln Dairy Company v. FiniganNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Reesman v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1959

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API