Legal Opinion
Douponce v. Drake
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided October 29, 1998No. 98-M-387PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER Re: Independent Medical Examination and Third Party Subpoenas
COAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this automobile accident diversity case, defendant moves for an independent medical examination of plaintiff under Rule 35. Fed. R.Civ.P. Plaintiff does not oppose the examination, but moves for a protective order on the ground that the independent medical examiner, Dr. Wallace Larson, is biased in *566favor of defendants. Defendant also moves to quash or for protective orders concerning two subpoenas. A hearing was held October 1, 1998 and the parties were permitted to file supplemental…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shirsat v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Peters v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
- Bartell v. McCarrickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Tirado v. ErosaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Stinchcomb v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sexton v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
- Bryant v. Dillon Real Estate Company, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- Citron v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Newton v. CeasarCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Sexton v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.