Legal Opinion

United States v. Blazier

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided September 8, 2008No. ACM 36988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BRAND, Senior Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a panel of officers of negligent dereliction of duty,1 and wrongful use of ecstasy, methamphetamine, and marijuana, in violation of Articles 92 and 112a, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 912a. The approved sentence consists of a bad-conduct discharge, 45 days of confinement, and reduction to E-3.2 On appeal, the appellant asserts that the military judge erred in admitting hearsay and, in so doing, violated his right to confrontation under the Sixth Amendment.3 Finding no error, we affirm.

Background

On 5 June…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. RankinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  5. United States v. HarcrowCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BlazierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  2. United States v. BlazierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API