Legal Opinion
Queen Uno Ltd. Partnership v. Coeur D'Alene Mines Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 15, 1998No. 97-WY-1431-CBPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
BRIMMER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have moved for class certification under Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired Coeur d’Alene Mines- Corporation’s (the “Company”) common stock, MARCs or 6 3/8% convertible debentures between January 9, 1995, and July 11, 1996. This proposed Plaintiffs’ class would exclude Defendants, members of their families and any *690entity in which any Defendant has an interest. For the reasons that follow, IT IS ORDERED that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Chill v. Green Tree Financial Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- McNichols v. Loeb Rhoades & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Simon v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re NYSE Specialists Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Maez v. Springs Automotive Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
- In re Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2001
- Pueblo of Zuni v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.