Legal Opinion

Welsh v. Barnes-Duluth Shipbuilding Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 30, 1945No. 34,064PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiff sues to recover $1,650. The complaint is in the form of a common indebitatus assumpsit count for money had and received. The defense was that the money claimed represented an unpaid contingent salary increase granted by defendant to plaintiff as its employe, which it carried on its books as a contingent or reserve credit in his favor, and that plaintiff in consideration of future employment released and discharged defendant from liability and assigned and transferred the credit to it. The reply denied the release and discharge and alleged that plaintiff assigned…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Storm v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Topken, Loring & Schwartz, Inc. v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Locke v. First Div. of the St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
  4. Rye v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Smith v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Heaton Distributing Co., Inc. v. Union Tank Car Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  2. Rom v. CalhounSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Nelson v. the Swedish HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Sloan v. SloanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Forsman v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API