Forsman v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Andersen, A.C.J.
Facts of Case
At issue in this case is the construction of a private insurance policy designated "Workmen's Compensation and Employers' Liability Policy — Voluntary Compensation Endorsement."
Patricia Forsman and her husband commenced this action against Aetna Casualty and Surety Company. It was their claim that Aetna, in having them sign a final receipt and release after receiving some $22,338.99 in benefits under its policy, had defrauded them and that the release was also invalid on the grounds of mutual mistake and lack of consideration.
Aetna's motion for summary judgment on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Bank v. Equity InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Jeffries v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Stringfellow v. StringfellowWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ValdezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cressionnie v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Norris v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Reynolds v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- City of Milwaukee v. Department of Industry & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995