Crouch v. Siemens Short-Term Disability Plan

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DAVID A. FABER, Senior District Judge.

Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 20, 23), as well as plaintiffs motion to strike defendants’ memorandum in opposition (Doc. No. 27). For the reasons set forth below, the court denies the latter motion, denies defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and grants in part plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

There appears to be little dispute between the parties as to the material facts. Plaintiff Maxfield Crouch is a former em ployee of…