Legal Opinion

Lutz v. Cybularz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1992No. 2580PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order dated July 22, 1991, granting summary judgment in favor of appellee Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. (“PNI”). Appellant Richard David Lutz (“Lutz”) argues that the trial court improperly granted summary judgment because issues of fact exist as to whether Paul Cybularz (“Cybularz”) was an agent of PNI and as to whether PNI was negligent for failing to determine if Cybularz was insured or licensed to drive. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

The underlying action arose when appellant was injured in an automobile accident with Cybularz. Cybularz…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Chorba v. Davlisa Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. McCain v. PennbankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Ortiz v. Ra-El Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Woolfolk v. DuncanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
  3. Sanders v. Farm, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County2000
  4. CHAMBERS v. BOB'S DISCOUNT FURNITUREDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Hart Trucking v. Robb H, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API