United States v. (Under Seal), in Re Antitrust Grand Jury Investigation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON L. WINTER, Chief Judge:
The district court quashed a grand jury subpoena on the ground that the prosecutor improperly sought to have the witness immunized and to compel him to testify in order to coerce a plea bargain from a relative of the witness. The district court also found that enforcement of the subpoena would aid the grand jury in its investigation.
The government has appealed, and we reverse.
I
Under the guidance of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, a grand jury was investigating bid rigging in the road building industry in Virginia. Appellee was subpoenaed to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Rea v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United States v. Mohammed IsmailCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Patricia Davies and Martin KaprelianCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. John David Moss and Corvette Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. (Four Cases) United States of America v. Under Seal, (Four Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.