Legal Opinion

United States v. (Under Seal), in Re Antitrust Grand Jury Investigation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 10, 1983No. 83-1138PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON L. WINTER, Chief Judge:

The district court quashed a grand jury subpoena on the ground that the prosecutor improperly sought to have the witness immunized and to compel him to testify in order to coerce a plea bargain from a relative of the witness. The district court also found that enforcement of the subpoena would aid the grand jury in its investigation.

The government has appealed, and we reverse.

I

Under the guidance of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, a grand jury was investigating bid rigging in the road building industry in Virginia. Appellee was subpoenaed to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Rea v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. United States v. Mohammed IsmailCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Patricia Davies and Martin KaprelianCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. John David Moss and Corvette Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  4. In Re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. (Four Cases) United States of America v. Under Seal, (Four Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API