Legal Opinion

Missouri State Life Insurance v. Martin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 19, 1934No. 4-3365PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATEMENT BY THE COURT.

This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment against appellant insurance company in favor of appellee, the beneficiary in an accident policy for double indemnity alleged to be due under the terms of the policy.

Appellee is named beneficiary in the policy issued to George W. Martin by the above insurance company on June 7, 1921, in the amount of $1,000. There was a rider or supplemental agreement attached to and made a part of the policy for the payment of $2,000, double the face of the policy, if the death of insured was accidental as hereinafter defined:

"This double…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wendorff v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  2. Levy v. Daniels' U-Drive Auto Renting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Masonic Accident Insurance v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Benham v. American Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  5. Head v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Great American Indem. Co. Of New York v. SaltzmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  2. Kinard v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n of Omaha, Neb.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1952
  3. Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  4. Martin v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N. Y.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Day v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API