Legal Opinion
Grande v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 18, 2000No. CIV. A. 98-2259PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
KATZ, Senior District Judge.
Before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Because there is no genuine issue of material fact, the court will grant the motion.
I. Background 1
Plaintiff Richard Grande was employed by State Farm from 1987 until October 1994. At the time of the events at issue in this case, Grande was working as a claims specialist in the Bodily Injury Unit at State Farm’s Hatfield, Pennsylvania office. His primary duty was to process automobile injury claims.
His secretary was Martha Littley. On September 26, 1994, Littley complained to Pius Kang,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Burnette v. Northside HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
- Summy-Long v. Pennsylvania State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Johnson v. McGraw-Hill CompaniesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Raya & Haig Hair Salon v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- SHARMBAN v. AetnaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.