Legal Opinion

SHARMBAN v. Aetna

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 16, 2003No. 2:02-cv-00444PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are the Motions for Summary Judgment of Defendants Aetna and Joe Kushnerick. In this case, Plaintiff Brigitte Shramban (“Plaintiff’) brings discrimination claims on the basis of race, sex, religion and national origin against Defendants under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 951 et seq. 1 Plaintiff also alleges retaliation and a hostile work environment. Additionally, Plaintiff brings a claim of aiding and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bumbarger v. New Enterprise Stone & Lime Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. LE v. City of WilmingtonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  3. Cannon v. Correctional Medical ServicesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  4. Duffy v. Department of StateDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  5. Shesko v. City of CoatesvilleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API