Legal Opinion
Edgar H. Wood Associates, Inc. v. Skene
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 17, 1964PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReardon, J.
The plaintiff (Wood) appeals from a final decree dismissing its original bill as to all the defendants, demurrers to it having previously been sustained. A motion for leave to file a substitute bill of complaint was denied by the trial judge as a matter of law because the substitute bill “does not state a cause of action in [ejquity.” The denial of the motion was in substance an interlocutory decree (Bressler v. Averbuck, 322 Mass. 139,143; see Corbett v. Gallagher, 225 Mass. 480, 482), and we treat it as open for consideration upon appeal from the final decree. Gr. L. c. 214, § 27. Arsenault…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Public Affairs Associates, Inc. v. RickoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and GriggSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Taco Cabana International, Inc. v. Two Pesos, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Druker v. Roland Wm. Jutras Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Jet Spray Cooler, Inc. v. CramptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- John G. Danielson, Inc. v. Winchester-Conant Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Warner Bros. Entertainment v. X One X ProductionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.