In re the Child of A.S.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
In this consolidated appeal, a mother and father challenge the termination of their parental rights, asserting that the district court erred by applying the presumption of palpable unfitness in Minn. Stat. § 260C.301, subd. 1(b)(4) (2004), to each of them. Mother and father also argue that the record as a whole rebuts any presumption of unfitness. Father also challenges venue in Koochiching County. Because (1) the district court did not apply the presumption of palpable unfitness to father and did not err in applying the presumption to mother; (2) the record does not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re the Welfare of L.A.F.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re the Welfare of D.L.R.D.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re the Welfare of the Child of W.L.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re the Welfare of A.L.F.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of the Child of T.D.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- In re Welfare of K. L. W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019