Legal Opinion

ORANGE WATER, ETC. v. Town of Carrboro

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 7, 1982No. 8115SC1003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.

Plaintiff initiated this action to recover from defendant $20,124.00 for fire hydrant rental charges in arrears at the time of the complaint, plus additional rental charges which would accrue before trial. The case was tried before a judge. From judgment for the plaintiff, defendant appealed raising questions as to the legal basis for its liability for the fire hydrant rental charges. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of Superior Court.

I

The underlying facts of this conflict appear to be undisputed: Plaintiff is a water and sewer utility…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Cogdill v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Arcade County Water District v. Arcade Fire DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Riverside, Inc. v. Gulf States Utilities CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. James River Equipment, Inc. v. Tharpe's Excavating, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Wing v. Town of LandisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Johnson v. Starboard Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API