State Ex Rel. Frasch v. Miller
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAjllen, J.
The plaintiffs in error have stated no question of law, either in their brief or upon oral argument, which could not have been decided with equal justice to the litigants on error proceedings from the judgment of the municipal court. The case would then have had both a hearing in the Court of Appeals and a hearing on motion to certify in this court, if so desired. The question of defect of parties defendant could have been raised by demurrer or answer. Not having been raised, it was waived.
It has been repeatedly stated by this court that a writ of prohibition is not available as a substitute…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marsh v. Goldthorpe, MayorOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- State Ex Rel. Brickell v. RoachOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- State Ex Rel. Knights Templar & Masonic Mutual Aid Ass'n v. Common Pleas CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Special Prosecutors v. JudgesOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State ex rel. Adams v. GusweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State, Ex Rel. Ferguson v. ShoemakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Moss v. ClairOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Norris v. HodappOhio Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.