Legal Opinion

Shurlow v. Lewis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1912No. Docket No. 70PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Lenawee; O’Mealey, J. Assumpsit by Edwin T. Shurlow against John E. Lewis and other stockholders of the Michigan Southern Brick & Tile Company for work, labor and services performed for said corporation. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

In the absence of such a statement of facts by appellants as the rule requires, it is perhaps sufficient to state that plaintiff recovered a judgment against the Michigan Southern Brick & Tile Company, a corporation organized and doing business under the statute of this State relating to manufacturing companies, alleged to be for personal work and labor of the plaintiff for said corporation. Said judgment was rendered on November 1, 1909, for $643.43 damages and costs of suit. An execution was duly issued and returned unsatisfied in part, and, for the purpose of collecting the amount…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Guerney v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Mathez v. . NeidigNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. McGunn. v. HanlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Fowler v. LamsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Norris v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Comstock v. PotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API