Legal Opinion

McGunn. v. Hanlin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1874PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Livingston Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The bill in this cause was filed to obtain a settlement of partnership accounts arising out of business conducted at Howell, in Livingston county, between April 9,1867, and *478February 19, 1868. McGunn, having before done business .alone, he on the former day entered into written articles, purporting to be between him as a half owner in the new firm, on the one part, and Arnold and William Hanlin as representing a single interest on the other. Arnold Hanlin, however, was the only one who signed with McGunn, and it turned out on the proof that William was a boy of seventeen or eighteen years, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jacobs v. StokesMichigan Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. E. E. Tripp Excavating Contractor, Inc. v. Jackson CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Lowe v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 705Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Nurney v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. In Re Nestorovski EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Williams v. Branning Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API