Legal Opinion

Cason v. American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided April 26, 1940No. 132PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SYMES, District Judge.

The charge is that: Defendant operates a foundry for the manufacture of brake shoes, etc., in Denver and employed plaintiff as a laborer from 1923 to 1925, inclusive, and from 1926 to October 8, 1936, inclusive, as a moulder in the foundry. At various times plaintiff also operated the mill or rattlers for the cleaning of brake shoes; he was also engaged in chipping and grinding brake shoes. The plaintiff worked in a closed room where large quantities of sand, ‘silica and special powders were used in moulding, grinding, etc., and a great deal of gas, vapor, dust and other…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Palmer v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Carroll v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pershing Quicksilver Co. v. ThiersNevada Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Arthur L. Summer v. Victor Chemical Works, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API