Legal Opinion
Arrant v. Zambrano
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 15, 2020No. 3:20-cv-01220Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELVIN RAY ARRANT Case No.: 3:20-cv-01220-JLS-AGS CDCR No. K98602, 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR Plaintiff, 13 RECONSIDERATION vs. 14 (ECF No. 8) M. ZAMBRANO, HAYES, 15 DELLINGER, ASFOUR, S. BEYER, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 On June 29, 2020, Melvin Ray Arrant (“Plaintiff”) filed a civil action pursuant to 42 20 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) and a Motion 21 for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). ECF Nos. 1–3. On September 9, 2020, the 22 Court granted Plaintiff’s IFP,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ybarra v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Zimmerman v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Murray W. Miller, Cross-Appellee v. Transamerican Press, Inc., Cross-Appellants, and Sam Steiger, Deponent, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Anant Kumar Tripati v. Gary L. Henman R.J. Barncastle Willis Gibson Richard A. Stacy Leland Pico Dale BerndtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. David FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.