Legal Opinion

Clark v. Schumacher

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 8, 1990No. CA A61265PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*3JOSEPH, C. J.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of the validity of two Department of Corrections rules that authorize fines for prison disciplinary violations. ORS 183.400.

The rules are titled “Inmate Prohibited Conduct and Procedure for Processing Disciplinary Actions.” The notice of intended rulemaking was dated January 29,1989. The amendments were effective on April 21, 1989. OAR 291-105-036 is headed “Imposition of Sanctions-Informal Disciplinary Hearings” and.provides, in part:

“Upon finding that a violation occurred as charged, the Disciplinary Adjudicator may:
“(9) Impose a fine not to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Oregon Funeral Directors Ass'n v. Oregon State Mortuary & Cemetery BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Pilgrim v. Clatskanie People's Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Barrett v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Knight Security of Oregon, Inc. v. SpickermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Smith v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API