Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 14, 2005No. A125875PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of two administrative rules of the Department of Corrections (DOC) pursuant to ORS 183.400. Petitioner argues that DOC lacked statutory authority to enact OAR 291-105-0010(15) 1 and OAR 291-105-0066(5), (6), and (9)(d), 2 concerning prison disciplinary fines, and that the rules violate various constitutional provisions. We reject without discussion petitioner’s constitutional arguments, and write only to address his argument that the rules lack statutory authority. As explained below, we hold that the rules are valid.

OAR 291-105-0010(15) defines “[fiine” as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Clark v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Employers Ins. of Wausau v. Tektronix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Karjalainen v. Curtis Johnston & Pennywise, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Edwards v. Riverdale School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. O'Neil-Barrett v. Dept. of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API