Legal Opinion

Weymouth v. Chism

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 26, 2001No. CA 01-94PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andree LAYTON Roaf, Judge.

Harry A. Weymouth appeals from a summary judgment granted to appellee Johnny Lee Chism, dismissing Weymouth’s negligence complaint against Chism based on the running of the three-year statute of limitations. Weymouth had nonsuited a previous action filed against Chism in 1998, almost three years to the day after a 1995 vehicular accident. However, Weymouth had failed to serve this complaint upon Chism within the requisite 120 days. Weymouth refiled and timely served the complaint in 2000; Chism raised the statute-of-limitations defense in a motion for summary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green v. WigginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Sublett v. HippsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Wright v. EddingerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Eddinger v. WrightDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Webster v. WebsterMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Montgomery v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Charles R. Webster, Jr. v. Jean Lala WebsterMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Shannon Montgomery v. SmithKline Beecham CorporationMississippi Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API