Legal Opinion
Flanders + Medeiros Inc. v. Bogosian
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided November 14, 1994No. Civ. A. 91-0026LPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAGUEUX, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) and Rule 32(e)(2) of the Local Rules of this Court, plaintiff Flanders + Medeiros, Inc., (“F + M”) objects to the recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy M. Boudewyns: 1) that F + M’s motion for summary judgment should be denied on its breach of contract claim as contained in the Complaint against defendant Elizabeth Y. Bogosian (“Bogosian”); and 2) that the reasonableness of F + M’s fees as a matter of law cannot appropriately be determined under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(d). Bogosian objects to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Paterson-Leitch Company, Inc. v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bogosian v. Woloohojian Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- URI Cogeneration Partners, L.P. v. Board of Governors for Higher EducationDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1996
- Flanders & Medeiros, Inc. v. Elizabeth v. BogosianCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Ross-Simons of Warwick, Inc. v. Baccarat, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1999
- Russell v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. of RIDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.