Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Barry

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 21, 1922No. 22,475PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to determine adverse claims. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant Jens J. Opsahl appeals.

The plaintiff claims title through tax proceedings on the 1914 judgment for delinquent taxes. The defendants Barry and Rad-spinner do not appear. Barry formerly owned the land involved. It was assessed in his name. Radspinner was the equitable owner under a contract from Opsahl. Unless divested by the tax title the defendant Opsahl is the owner subject to a mineral reservation in favor of his remote grantors and subject to the equitable title of Radspinner.

The defendant Radspinner…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Washburn v. Gregory Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Hoyt v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Bennett v. BlatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Bell v. McLarenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Burbridge v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. BODEL CORPORATION v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. State v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API