State v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Magney, Commissioner.
It is the claim of the State of Minnesota that certain lands in St: Louis County here involved were forfeited to it for the nonpayment of taxes. After the tax-forfeiture proceedings had been completed, the state conveyed the surface interest in and to the lands to the Huron Land Company but retained the minerals and mineral rights. The lands contain mineral deposits known as taconite. This action arises out of an application by the state to register the title under the Torrens law to the reserved minerals and mineral rights in said lands, claiming ownership of said…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Bunge v. YagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- D'Autremont v. Anderson Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Alvin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Sanborn v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980