Legal Opinion

Bell v. McLaren

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 13, 1903No. Nos. 13,346—(265)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Kelly, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

Action to determine adverse claims to real estate. The trial court made its findings of fact, and, as a conclusion .of law therefrom, directed judgment for the defendant on the merits. The plaintiff appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. ■

The facts are undisputed. The plaintiff is the owner in fee of the land in controversy, unless a sale thereof to the defendant pursuant to a tax judgment in proceedings upon an assessment for opening, extending, and widening State street, in the city of St. Paul, is valid. In the deed of the city to the defendant the land was described…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Herrick v. MorrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jallo v. JalloSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Campbell v. BarrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API