Legal Opinion

Arizona Lotus Corp. v. City of Phoenix

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 24, 1983No. 1 CA-CIV 5494PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Presiding Judge.

Appellants, a group of Phoenix broadcasters and a billboard company, challenge in several respects the legality of taxes assessed by the City of Phoenix (City) pursuant to its privilege tax on advertising. The issues involved in this appeal include:(1) whether the City properly taxed revenues generated by national advertising from November 1, 1977 through December 19, 1978;(2) whether the City properly taxed revenues generated by spot religious announcements; .and(3) whether the City properly taxed revenues generated by the production of commercials (production…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Mardian Construction Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Sandblom v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  5. Simplicity Pattern Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  2. Arizona Department of Revenue v. M. Greenberg ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. Brown Wholesale Electric Co. v. Merchants Mutual Bonding Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Rowe International, Inc. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API