State v. Pratt
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Defendant contends that the finding of fact upon which the court revoked her probation was not supported by sufficient evidence. We agree with the contention.
Many cases involving the revocation of suspended sentences and probation judgments have found their way to the appellate courts of this State. A review of a representative number of those cases leads us to conclude that an accurate statement of the law on the question of revocation of probation is as follows: A proceeding to revoke probation is not a criminal prosecution but is a proceeding solely for the determination by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. McMilliamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. MortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. SawyerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. MonkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. BainesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- In Re O'NealCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- In re D.J.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.