Legal Opinion
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Coeur Alaska, Inc., Defendant-Intervenors-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 8, 2006No. 06-35679PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellee Coeur Alaska, Inc.’s Urgent Motion Under Circuit Rule 27-3(b) to Vacate the Injunction Pending Appeal is denied. The court granted Appellant Southeast Alaska Conservation Council’s (“SEACC”) Emergency Motion Under Circuit Rule 27-3 on August 24, 2006, at which time the court issued an injunction pending appeal. The court’s order enjoined Coeur Alaska, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”), and the U.S. Forest Service from activities relating to the construction of a disposal facility at Lower Slate Lake. On November 7, 2006, Coeur Alaska filed its motion to vacate the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Purcell v. GonzalezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Sharp v. WestonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Clear Channel Outdoor Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Epic v. Ann CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Leslie Feldman v. Arizona Sec'y of State's Ofc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Ritesh Tandon v. Gavin NewsomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.