Commonwealth v. King
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
COLVILLE, J.:
¶ 1 This case is an appeal from judgment of sentence. There are three issues: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support Appellant’s conviction for third degree murder; (2) whether the trial court erred in denying Appellant’s motion to bar his trial on grounds of double jeopardy; and (3) whether the trial court erred in not setting aside the verdict due to juror misconduct. We affirm the judgment of sentence.
Facts
¶ 2 The record reveals the following facts. In the weeks preceding the incident in question, Appellant encountered Oth-mane Lahmamsi (“the Victim”).…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TedfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. KimbroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. MarquezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. BaskervilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. HabaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HouckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. GordySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. StreetSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. CoonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. HouckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.